ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of the " step-up approach" versus the " step-jump approach" in treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN).Method:The clinical data of IPN patients who underwent step-up strategy or step-jump strategy treatment at the Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from December 2018 to November 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done based on the nearest neighbor matching method (1: 1 ratio). After matching the baseline data (the caliper value was 0.01), a total of 62 patients with IPN were included, including 41 males and 21 females, aged (41.1±13.1) years old. Patients who were treated with the step-up strategy were included in the step-up group, while patients who were treated with the step-jump strategy were included in the step-jump group. There were 31 patients in each group after PSM, and the treatment effect of the two groups were compared.Results:Of the 62 patients with IPN, 43 received surgical intervention, and 19 were managed successfully using symptomatic anti-inflammatory treatment or percutaneous catheter drainage. The total hospitalization cost of patients in the step-jump group was significantly higher than that in the step-up group [122 000 (73 000, 179 000) yuan vs. 88 000 (46 000, 144 000) yuan, P=0.034]. The overall cure rate of IPN patients in the step-jump group was 93.5%(29/31). The 2 patients who died had type Ⅲ IPN. In the IPN patients in the step-up group were all cured, and the overall cure rate was 100%(31/31), with no death. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in the rates of death, postoperative complications, residual infection, debridement ≥2 times, and positive bacterial culture in blood or drainage fluid (all P>0.05). A total of 19.4% (12/62) patients had postoperative complications, including 4 patients with abdominal bleeding, 3 patients with new organ dysfunction, 2 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, 2 patients with gastrointestinal fistula, and 1 patient with venous thrombosis in both lower limbs. Conclusion:Both the step-up treatment strategy and the step-jump treatment strategy were safe and effective for treatment of IPN patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the clinical features and risk factors of death in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRB).Methods:The clinical data of 219 IPN patients who were managed at the Department of General Surgery of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 142 males, and 77 females, with a median age [ M( Q1, Q3)] of 51(38, 62) years old. Based on the pre-sence or absence of MDRB infection, these patients were divided into the MDRB-infected group ( n=117) and the non-MDRB-infected group ( n=102). Clinical features and outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors resulting in death in patients with MDRB infection were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with MDRB. Results:There were significant differences in etiologies, distribution characteristics of necrosis and degrees of pancreatic necrosis between the two groups (all P<0.05). When compared with the non-MDRB-infected group, the CT severity index, the levels of procalcitonin and interleukin-6 were significantly higher in the MDRB group on admission, while the hematocrit was significantly lower (all P<0.05). Furthermore, when compared with the non-MDRB infection group, patients with MDRB infection were significantly more likely to have fungal infections [37.6%(44/117) vs. 21.6%(22/102)] and extrapancial infections [75.2%(88/117) vs. 58.8%(60/102)], more patients underwent surgery [89.7%(105/117) vs. 67.6%(69/102)], and more surgical procedures were performed [3(2, 4) times vs. 2(1, 3) times], with a higher incidence of postoperative complications [36.2%(38/117) vs. 18.8%(13/102)], an increase in a new-onset organ failure after surgery [37.1%(39/117) vs. 21.7%(15/102)], a higher in-hospital mortality rate [25.6%(30/117) vs. 10.8%(11/102)], longer hospitalization [39(28, 67) d vs. 29(18, 35) d] and ICU stays [22(10, 42) d vs. 11(6, 18) d], and a longer need for parenteral nutrition [19(9, 37) d vs. 15(7, 25) d, all P<0.05]. On multivariate regression analysis, the risk factor for death in the MDRB-infected group was co-fungal infection ( OR=1.199, 95% CI: 1.025-1.402). On the other hand, receiving therapy containing tigacycline ( OR=0.831, 95% CI: 0.715-0.965) and minimally invasive surgery ( OR=0.698, 95% CI: 0.562-0.868) reduced the risk of death in the MDRB-infected group (all P<0.05). Conclusions:IPN patients with MDRB infection had higher levels of inflammation, more serious pancreatic necrosis, longer treatment time, and increased need for surgical treatment. Measures involving fungal infection control and the use of tigacyclin and minimally invasive surgery reduced the risks of death in patients with MDRB infection.
ABSTRACT
The step-up approach is the most important modality in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) and has been recommended by several national and international guidelines. Screening patients with low success rates of percutaneous drainage for timely treatment using the step-up approach and selecting appropriate escalation approach based on IPN staging are expected to improve the overall cure rate of IPN. The open debridement in the step-up approach should be carried out under reasonable indications and timing. When the patient's overall condition is poor and the condition of disease is complex, it is not necessary to adhere to a fixed treatment mode and choose a leapfrogging treatment strategy in a timely manner after thorough evaluation.When following the step-up approach in the treatment of IPN, endoscopic and surgical interventions are advocated in parallel, and escalating and leapfrogging strategies are promoted to establish an integrated, disease-centric, multidisciplinary treatment platform, with the aim of improving clinical prognosis. The authors review relevant literature and combine with team's treatment experience to explore the escalating strategies of surgical intervention for IPN, with a view to further improving the overall cure rate of IPN patients.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: La necrosectomía pancreática abierta es una técnica quirúrgica empleada en la infección de la necrosis. Objetivo: Identificar los factores relacionados con el pronóstico en pacientes operados con el diagnóstico de pancreatitis aguda necrotizante. Método: Se realizó una cohorte prospectiva en enfermos operados con el diagnóstico de pancreatitis aguda necrotizante, en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital General Universitario "Carlos Manuel de Céspedes" de Bayamo, Granma, en el período 2018 - 2020. Se incluyeron 61 pacientes con este diagnóstico. Se estudiaron variables demográficas, clínicas, humorales y quirúrgicas. Se utilizó una estrategia bivariado y multivariado. Resultados: En el análisis bivariado se destacó la influencia de la edad (RR 3,34 IC 95 por ciento 0,17-0,68) y el índice de severidad tomográfica (RR 1,85 IC 95 por ciento 0,66-2,37), la disfunción múltiple de órganos (RR 5,06 IC 95 por ciento 1,08-2,15), la cirugía precoz (2,78 IC 95 por ciento 1,00-3,34) y la infección de la necrosis (RR 6,60 IC 95 por ciento 1,01-5,23). En el modelo de regresión logística multivariado quedaron incluidos como variables independientes asociadas al pronóstico la disfunción múltiple de órganos (RR 6,58 IC 95 por ciento 2,40-18,08) y la infección de la necrosis (RR, 14,20 IC 95 por ciento 5,93 -34,01) Conclusiones: El análisis de la mortalidad evidenció que los factores que demostraron asociación significativa fueron la disfunción múltiple de órganos y la infección de la necrosis(AU)
Introduction: Open pancreatic necrosectomy is a surgical technique used in necrosis infection. Objective: To identify the factors related to prognosis in patients operated on under the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out in patients operated on under the diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, in the intensive care unit of Carlos Manuel de Céspedes General University Hospital of Bayamo, Granma, Cuba, in the period 2018-2020. Sixty-one patients with this diagnosis were included. Demographic, clinical, humoral and surgical variables were studied. A bivariate and multivariate strategy was used. Results: In the bivariate analysis, the influence of age (relative risk [RR]=3.34; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.68) and tomographic severity index (RR=1.85; 95 percent CI: 0.66-2.37), as well as multiple organ dysfunction (RR=5.06; 95 percent CI: 1.08-2.15), early surgery (RR=2.78; 95 percent CI: 1.00-3.34) and necrosis infection (RR=6.60; 95 percent CI: 1.01-5.23) were highlighted. In the multivariate logistic regression model, multiple organ dysfunction (RR=6.58; 95 percent CI: 2.40-18.08) and infection of necrosis (RR=14.20; 95 percent CI: 5.93-34.01) were included as independent variables associated with prognosis. Conclusions: Mortality analysis evidenced that the factors that showed significant association were multiple organ dysfunction and necrosis infection(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing , Intensive Care Units , Necrosis/mortality , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgeryABSTRACT
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Hot AXIOS, a novel luminal metal stent with a cautery system guided by endoscopic ultrasound, for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN), 5 cases of IPN treated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided Hot AXIOS placement in Hangzhou First People's Hospital from December 2021 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The results showed that all 5 cases successfully completed the treatment, with 8-21 minutes of the operation time. The symptoms of abdominal pain and bloating on the first day after operation were significantly relieved, and the abdominal CT showed that the walled-off necrosis was significantly reduced. After 2-9 times of direct endoscopic necrosectomy, supplemented by antibiotics, patient's temperature and blood inflammatory indexes returned to normal, the cavity was reduced and necrosis was removed. The Hot AXIOS stent was indwelled for 12-40 days and then removed. After 25-113 days of the follow-up, all patients survived without recurrence. Preliminary results suggest that endoscopic ultrasound-guided Hot AXIOS placement is safe and effective for the treatment of IPN.
ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo investigate the potential association between early-stage inflammatory response and late-stage infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 219 patients with moderate-severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) and 53 patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) who were admitted to The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from June 2019 to June 2020, and according to the presence or absence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at the initial stage of the disease, they were divided into SIRS group with 160 patients and non-SRIS group with 112 patients. Baseline data, serological markers, complications, and mortality rate were included for analysis. The t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between multiple groups, and the Bonferroni method was used for further comparison between two groups. A logistic regression analysis was used to screen out valuable variables; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic value of variables, and the Z-test was used for pairwise comparison of area under the ROC curve (AUC). ResultsCompared with the non-SIRS group, the SIRS group had significantly higher white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (all P＜0.05) and a significantly higher proportion of patients with acute peripancreatic necrosis (ANC), IPN, pancreatic necrosis (PN), organ dysfunction, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), SAP, critically-ill acute pancreatitis (CAP), death, BISAP score ＞2, CTSI score ＞2,or RANSON score ＞2 (all P＜0.05). The univariate analysis showed that SIRS duration, obesity, CRP, WBC, blood urea nitrogen, PN, ANC, SAP, MODS, RANSON score, BISAP score, and CTSI score were risk factors for IPN in patients with AP (all P＜005), and the multivariate analysis showed that SIRS duration (odds ratio ［OR］=1.307, 95% confidence interval ［CI］: 1.081-1580, P=0006) and ANC (OR=42.247, 95% CI: 10.829-164.818, P＜0.001) were risk factors for IPN; when ANC was excluded, SIRS duration (OR=1.430, 95% CI: 1.207-1.694, P＜0.001) and PN (OR=5.296, 95% CI: 1.845-15.203, P=0.002) were risk factors for IPN. The ROC curve showed that SIRS duration (AUC=0.772, Youden index=0.521), RANSON score (AUC=0701, Youden index=0.319), BISAP score (AUC=0.741, Youden index=0.377), and CTSI score (AUC=0.765, Youden Index=0.414) had a certain value in predicting IPN, and there was no significant difference in AUC between any two indices. The long-duration SIRS group(＞4 d) had a significantly higher proportion of patients with PN, ANC, IPN, SAP, or CAP than the non-SIRS group(0 d), the transient SIRS group(1~2 d), and the persistent SIRS group(3~4 d) (all P＜0.05), and the persistent SIRS group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with SAP than the non-SIRS group (P＜0.05). ConclusionAP patients with SIRS in the early stage are likely to develop organ failure and local complications, and there is a significant increase in the risk of IPN when SIRS duration is ＞4.5 days.
ABSTRACT
Resumen Objetivo: describir el comportamiento clínico y quirúrgico de los pacientes con pancreatitis aguda manejados en un centro hospitalario de cuarto nivel. Método: se realizó un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo analítico de los pacientes con diagnóstico de pancreatitis aguda que ingresaron al Hospital Universitario de Neiva en el período comprendido entre el 1 de enero del 2015 al 31 de julio del 2017. Resultados: se identificaron 138 pacientes que ingresaron con impresión diagnóstica de pancreatitis aguda, de los cuales se confirmó el diagnóstico en 130 pacientes y se excluyeron 21 pacientes por no cumplir con los criterios de inclusión. Según la clasificación de Atlanta 2012, 73 (67 %) pacientes cursaban con una pancreatitis leve, 17 (16 %) con pancreatitis moderadamente severa y 19 (17 %) con pancreatitis severa. La principal causa de pancreatitis encontrada fue la biliar. La prueba de chi cuadrado (χ2) mostró una significancia estadística para la edad como factor de riesgo para pancreatitis severa (p = 0,04). De la totalidad de pacientes, en 8 pacientes se documentó necrosis pancreática, de los cuales 5 fueron manejados quirúrgicamente, con un abordaje por laparotomía en 3 pacientes y 2 por laparoscopia, con una mortalidad del 37,5 % en los pacientes con necrosis pancreática manejados quirúrgicamente. De los 109 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, 100 pacientes (91,74 %) resolvieron su cuadro de pancreatitis y egresaron vivos de la institución, para una mortalidad reportada en 9 pacientes (8,25 %), quienes cursaron con pancreatitis aguda severa. Conclusión: el estudio presentado es de tipo descriptivo estableciendo las características demográficas y el curso de la enfermedad de los pacientes con pancreatitis aguda incluidos las complicaciones y el manejo de estas. Con este estudio no se pretende estandarizar causalidad ni manejo de la patología descrita, solo se describe la experiencia realizada en un hospital de cuarto nivel tratando de contribuir con el desarrollo de estudios de cohortes y ensayos clínicos que permitan establecer guías de manejo con el fin de mejorar los desenlaces de los pacientes con pancreatitis aguda.
Abstract Objective: Our objective was to describe the clinical and surgical behavior of patients with acute pancreatitis managed at a fourth level hospital center. Method: This is a descriptive, retrospective and analytical study of patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis who entered the University Hospital of Neiva in the period from January 1, 2015 to July 31, 2017. Results: We identified 138 patients who had been admitted with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Of these, the diagnosis was confirmed for 130 patients, but 21 patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. According to the 2012 Atlanta classification, 73 (67%) patients had mild pancreatitis, 17 (16%) had moderately severe pancreatitis, and 19 (17%) had severe pancreatitis. The main cause of pancreatitis was biliary. The chi-square test showed statistical significance for age as a risk factor for severe pancreatitis (p = 0.04). Pancreatic necrosis was documented in 8 patients, five of whom were managed surgically. This included three laparotomies and two laparoscopic operations. The mortality rate for patients with surgically managed pancreatic necrosis was 37.5%. Of the 109 patients included in the study, the resolved their pancreatitis of 100 patients (91.74%) was resolved and they left the institution alive. Nine patients (8.25%), all of whom had severe acute pancreatitis, died. Conclusion: This descriptive study established the demographic characteristics and clinical course of patients with acute pancreatitis including complications and management of complications. This study is not intended to standardize causality or management of acute pancreatitis, but rather only describes the experience of a fourth level hospital in order to contribute to the development of cohort studies and clinical trials that will allow establishment of management guidelines to improve the outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pancreatitis , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing , Patients , Records , ClassificationABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the therapeutic value of transnasal gastroscopy and conventional gastroscopy for infective pancreatic necrosis(IPN) through percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy(PEN).@*Methods@#A total of 24 IPN patients who received PEN for IPN from December 2015 to March 2019 were divided into the conventional gastroscopy group (n=15) and the transnasal gastroscopy group (n=9). The clinical therapeutic indicators such as vital signs, APACHE Ⅱ score changes, operation duration, difference in preoperative and postoperative volumes of peripancreatic necrosis and other indicators were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#There was no significant difference in the variation curve fitting of APACHE Ⅱ scores between the two groups (t=0.378, P=0.710). The operation time of the transnasal gastroscopy group was significantly shorter than that of the conventional gastroscopy group (119.7±47.4 min VS 172.8±56.2 min, P=0.018). Peripancreatic necrotic volume significantly decreased after operation in the transnasal gastroscopy group (404.03±170.73 mL VS 468.9±137.37 mL, P=0.002), and in the conventional gastroscopy group (499.44±227.17 mL VS 722.50±292.96 mL, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the decrease extent in the conventional gastroscopy group and the transnasal gastroscopy group (223.06±212.92 mL VS 64.87±54.94 mL, P= 0.094).@*Conclusion@#On the condition of poor drainage of percutaneous catheter drainage, PEN can significantly reduce the range of necrotic lesions. Transnasal gastroscopy has the advantages in operation time in PEN and clearing deep abscess cavities over conventional gastroscopy.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the feasibility and safety of stent-assisted percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (SAPEN) in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN).@*Methods@#The patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) who received the treatment of SAPEN for IPN were sequentially included from January 2018 to September 2018 in the Eastern Theater General Hospital of People′s Liberation Army. The demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The mortality and incidence of major organ dysfunctions were used as the primary observation endpoints.@*Results@#A total of 40 IPN patients were enrolled including 27 men and 13 women. The percutaneous covered stent placement procedures were successful in all cases; the median number of SAPEN operations was 1 (range 1-3), and no operation-related complications occurred. 32 patients were successfully cured by SAPEN, and the treatment effective rate was 80.0%. 5 patients (12.5%) required further open surgery after SAPEN. 12 patients developed new important organ dysfunction and 6 patients eventually died.@*Conclusions@#SAPEN was an effective and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of IPN, but its technical advantages still need to be further validated in large scale studies.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the serum angiopoietin-Ⅱ (Ang Ⅱ) levels in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients and the relationship between AngⅡ levels and the disease severity of AP based on the new Atlanta classification criteria.@*Methods@#Seventy-seven patients with AP who were treated in the Affiliated Baiyun Hospital of Guizhou Medical University were included in this prospective study. According to the revised Atlanta classification, the modified Mashall scoring system was used to divided patients into AP with the persistent organ failure(POF) group and without POF group, and the CECT was used to divided patients into AP with pancreatic necrosis(PN) group and without PN group. The levels of AP 72 h after admission of two groups were compared with t test, and Spearman analysis was used to analyze the correlation between common severity indicators and Ang Ⅱ. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was performed to analyze the area under curve(AUC), sensitivity and specificity of Ang Ⅱ in predicting POF and PN.@*Results@#According to the modified Mashall scoring system, there were 18 patients (23.38%) in POF group and 59 patients (76.62%) in without POF group. According to CECT, 22 patients (28.57%)were in PN group and 55 patients(71.43%) in without PN group. The Ang Ⅱ of the POF and PN groups was significantly higher than those without POF and PN groups (P=0.001, 0.011) on day 1 on admission. The cut-off value was 126.44 μg/L, and the AUC, sensitivity and specificity for predicting POF were 0.739, 83.3% and 68.4%, which was significantly better than that of traditional predictive indicators, such as C-reaction protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), bedside index for severity in AP (BISAP) score and Ranson score. When the cut-off value was 130.90 μg/L, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity for predicting PN were 0.703, 77.3% and 73.6%, respectively, which was significantly better than that of all traditional single indicator. The predicted value was less than PCT and CRP 2 or 3 day after admission. In addition, the Ang Ⅱlevel 1 day after admission was closely related to the Ranson score, BISAP score, and PCT level which was commonly used indicators of AP severity.@*Conclusions@#Under the new Atlanta classification criteria, Ang Ⅱ is superior to the traditional predictive indicators commonly used for predicting POF, and is a better single biochemical indicator for predicting PN in clinic.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the prognostic factors of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infection in patients with infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN).@*Methods@#A retrospective study was performed to assess the MDRO in IPN patients. The clinical data of 104 IPN patients admitted to the Department of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from June 2013 to January 2019 were analyzed. Fifty-six patients were allocated in the MDRO group and 48 patients in the non-MDRO group depended on drug sensitivity test. There were 37 males and 19 females in the MDRO group with age of 40 (23) years. The duration time was 3(5) days between onset and admission. In the non-MDRO group, 34 males and 14 females were included with age of (42±14) years. The duration time was 3(4) days between onset and admission. Normally distributed quantitative variables was represented by ±s, non-normally distributed quantitative variables was represented by M(QR). Wilcoxon rank-sum test and χ2 test were used to analyze the data. Univariate and multivariable Logistic regression analytic model were used to figure out the risk factors associated with MDRO infection.@*Results@#The mean duration of hospital stay was 29.5(31.8) days and hospitalization expenses were CNY 166 991(270 692), which were much higher than those in non-MDRO group (16.5(15.7) days, CNY 56 789(62 354)) (W=1 889, 2 019, both P<0.01). Gram-negative isolates(67.2%, 80/119) were commonly detected in IPN patients.Acinetobacter baumannii was the most common MDRO(27.0%,20/74). Initial use of carbapenem(OR=2.22, 95%CI: 1.02-4.96, P=0.047) and open necrosectomy(OR=10.00, 95%CI: 3.14-44.77, P<0.01) were the potential risk factors for MDRO-induced infections in IPN. Furthermore, the Logistic regression analysis revealed that open necrosectomy was the independent variable for MDRO infections(OR=9.42, 95%CI: 2.92-42.42, P<0.01).@*Conclusion@#Open necrosectomy is the independent risk factor for the infection of MDRO.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To examine the indications and effects of different surgical approaches in laparoscopic debridement for patients with infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN).@*Methods@#The clinical data of 213 IPN patients treated by laparoscopic debridement at Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2012 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.The therapeutic effects were summarized and analyzed according to different surgical approaches. There were 123 cases in retroperitoneal approach group, including 73 males and 50 females, aging of (51.3±12.4) years; 59 cases in omental sac approach group, including 32 males and 27 females, aging of (48.3±14.2) years; 23 cases in combined approach group, including 13 males and 10 females, aging of (54.3±19.7) years; 8 cases in digestive tract approach group, including 5 males and 3 females, aging of (50.2±12.5) years.@*Results@#The time from onset to operation in retro-peritoneal, omental sac, combined and digestive tract approach groups were (44.3±22.8), (47.3±24.3), (52.6±21.2), (51.2±30.1) days, respectively; the operation time was (52.3±26.4), (64.3±29.2), (82.8±24.7), (78.2±38.1) minutes respectively; the median bleeding volume was 18, 33, 42 and 30 ml, respectively; and the first time to eat after operation was (2.5±1.6), (3.8±1.8), (3.7±2.0), (8.4±3.9) days, respectively.The incidence of complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ and above) was 10.6%(13/123), 10.2%(6/59), 17.4%(4/23), 1/8 and the mortality was 4.9%(6/123), 3.4%(2/59), 4.3%(1/23) and 0, respectively.The overall mortality of all patients was 4.2%(9/213). The levels of inflammatory factors were significantly lower in all groups 7 days after operation than before, and no patients was converted to open surgery.@*Conclusion@#Individualized selection of the optimal laparoscopic debridement approach of pancreatic necrosis plays an important role in improving the efficacy and prognosis of IPN patients.
ABSTRACT
The application of minimally invasive technique in infected pancreatic necrosis has been matured gradually but has controversy and challenges in the same time. This paper further discusses the advantages, timing, combination of multi-video-assisted debridement and post-operative management of minimally invasive surgery. The greatest advantage of minimally invasive surgery lies in "No intervention for normal abdominal space" which not only can reduce unnecessary injury and complication but also promote intestinal function recovery after operation. The principle of delayed operation is controversial. Early PCD and "one-step" minimally invasive laparoscopic debridement and drainage have both achieved good results. The combination of multi-video-assisted minimally invasive technique can make up for the shortage of single technique to shorten the operation time and improve the debridement efficiency of patients with complicated infected pancreatic necrosis and provide new ideas for video-assisted debridement. Fully debridement and drainage are the key points and standardization for post-operative management. It′s a difficult problem and an important research direction to apply minimally invasive technique for patients with infected pancreatic necrosis reasonably and scientifically.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of stent-assisted percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (SAPEN) in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). Methods The patients with severe acute pancreatitis ( SAP) who received the treatment of SAPEN for IPN were sequentially included from January 2018 to September 2018 in the Eastern Theater General Hospital of People's Liberation Army. The demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The mortality and incidence of major organ dysfunctions were used as the primary observation endpoints. Results A total of 40 IPN patients were enrolled including 27 men and 13 women. The percutaneous covered stent placement procedures were successful in all cases;the median number of SAPEN operations was 1 ( range 1-3 ) , and no operation-related complications occurred. 32 patients were successfully cured by SAPEN, and the treatment effective rate was 80. 0％. 5 patients (12. 5％) required further open surgery after SAPEN. 12 patients developed new important organ dysfunction and 6 patients eventually died. Conclusions SAPEN was an effective and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of IPN, but its technical advantages still need to be further validated in large scale studies.
ABSTRACT
investigate the serum angiopoietin-Ⅱ (AngⅡ) levels in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients and the relationship between AngⅡlevels and the disease severity of AP based on the new Atlanta classification criteria. Methods Seventy-seven patients with AP who were treated in the Affiliated Baiyun Hospital of Guizhou Medical University were included in this prospective study. According to the revised Atlanta classification, the modified Mashall scoring system was used to divided patients into AP with the persistent organ failure(POF) group and without POF group, and the CECT was used to divided patients into AP with pancreatic necrosis(PN) group and without PN group. The levels of AP 72 h after admission of two groups were compared with t test, and Spearman analysis was used to analyze the correlation between common severity indicators and Ang Ⅱ. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was performed to analyze the area under curve(AUC), sensitivity and specificity of Ang Ⅱ in predicting POF and PN. Results According to the modified Mashall scoring system, there were 18 patients (23.38%) in POF group and 59 patients (76.62%) in without POF group. According to CECT, 22 patients (28.57%)were in PN group and 55 patients(71.43%) in without PN group. The AngⅡof the POF and PN groups was significantly higher than those without POF and PN groups (P＝0.001, 0.011) on day 1 on admission. The cut-off value was 126.44 μg/L, and the AUC, sensitivity and specificity for predicting POF were 0.739, 83.3% and 68.4%, which was significantly better than that of traditional predictive indicators, such as C-reaction protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), bedside index for severity in AP (BISAP) score and Ranson score. When the cut-off value was 130.90 μg/L, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity for predicting PN were 0.703, 77.3% and 73.6%, respectively, which was significantly better than that of all traditional single indicator. The predicted value was less than PCT and CRP 2 or 3 day after admission. In addition, the Ang Ⅱlevel 1 day after admission was closely related to the Ranson score, BISAP score, and PCT level which was commonly used indicators of AP severity. Conclusions Under the new Atlanta classification criteria, Ang Ⅱ is superior to the traditional predictive indicators commonly used for predicting POF, and is a better single biochemical indicator for predicting PN in clinic.
ABSTRACT
American Gastroenterological Association(AGA)has published the latest clinical practice update in Gastroenterology in August 2019. The purpose of this AGA clinical practice update is to review the available evidence and expert recommendations regarding the clinical care of patients with pancreatic necrosis and to offer concise best practice advice for the optimal management of patients with this highly morbid condition. In recent decades,with the improvement in clinical practice,the management of pancreatic necrosis in patients with acute pancreatitis(AP)has undergone great changes. The well-defined step-up approach has been more advocated rather than the traditional open surgery. The treatment of pancreatic necrosis mainly includes two aspects,conservative methods, which consist of antimicrobial therapy as well as nutrition support,and invasive interventions.Drainage and/or debridement of pancreatic necrosis is best indicated in patients with infected necrosis or patients with sterile pancreatic necrosis and persistent clinical symptoms,which need proactive management. A step-up approach consists of percutaneous drainage or endoscopic transmural drainage, followed by direct endoscopic/percutaneous minimally invasive necrosectomy, and then surgical debridement is reasonable. As for the comparison between percutaneous surgical or endoscopic step-up approach,no studies have shown that there are differences between the two in the main clinical outcomes,for instance,mortality. Hence,the choice of specific treatment strategy in different AP centers depends mainly on their available clinical expertise and medical resources.
ABSTRACT
Recently,with the further understanding of infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN),pancreatologists have reached consensuses on that the presence of gas on CT imaging could be the golden standard diagnosis for IPN,the intervention timing for IPN should be delayed to four weeks later,and the step-up approach acts as the first standard treatment strategy for IPN.Whereas in clinical practice,there are substantial new challenges awaiting our solutions,for instance,the lack of accurate and specific diagnostic criteria for IPN without typical gas sign on CT imaging,whether the intervention of wall-off necrosis(WON)which got infected prematurely should be delayed to four weeks later?What's more,whether the endoscopy centered step-up approach is superior to the surgical step-up approach?Is it time to abandon open surgery in IPN management?If not,when should we switch to open necrosectomy?All of these questions are still full of controversies.
ABSTRACT
Infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN) is one of the complications of acute pancreatitis(AP).Since it brings high mortality and heavy financial burden,more and more scholars begin to focus on its mechanism and treatment.This paper reviewed the research progress of the disease,from pathological,pathophysiologic and immunologic researches based on the animal and clinical experiments,to the actuality of diagnosis and treatment based on the practical work as well as international and domestic consensus.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of open surgical drainage approach for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis ( WOPN) in severe acute pancreatitis. Methods Clinical data of 154 WOPN patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2005 to October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Traditional open debridement necrosectomy was performed in 83 patients from January 2005 to October 2012 ( debridement group) , and small abdominal incision with low-position open surgical drainage was performed in 71 patients from October 2012 to October 2016 ( drainage group ) . The clinical outcomes of two groups were analyzed and compared. Results 43 cases (51. 8％) in debridement group had postoperative intraperitoneal reinfection, while there were only 13 cases with postoperative intraperitoneal reinfection (18. 3％) in drainage group;18 cases (21. 7％) in debridement group had surgery-related digestive tract fistula, while there were only 4 cases with surgery-related digestive tract fistula (5. 6％) in drainage group; the differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 18. 55, P=0. 001; χ2 = 11. 35, P=0. 002). 15 patients (18. 1％) in debridement group and only 2 patients (2. 8％) in drainage group died. The mortality in drainage group were obviously lower than that in debridement group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 9. 07, P<0. 05 ). 62 cases ( 74. 7％) in debridement group and 55 cases (77. 5％) in drainage group were cured directly, respectively. No significant difference was found between two groups. However, 3 cases (3. 6％) in debridement group and 12 cases (16. 9％) in drainage group were cured by the way of small intestinal fistula in the late stage of intubation, and the latter was higher than the former with statistically significant(χ2 =5. 989,P=0. 014). Conclusions Compared with open debridement necrosectomy, the abdominal infection rate, digestive tract fistula rate and mortality of open surgical drainage were all significantly reduced , which may be a better treatment for WOPN.